graemegets posted on June 14, 2008 13:15

I was watching a program on TV called 'What Happens if" which is a sort of 'try some idea out and see what happens, with some science etc ' thrown in. The episode I watched was all about 'what would happen if we shot a bullet out of a car  where the bullet is traveling at 60mph and the car is traveling at 60mph? Would the bullet just hang alongside the car?' Well I learned in primary school that this would not be the case.

If the Bullet was traveling at 60mph and the car was traveling at 60 mph then the relative speed of the bullet would be 120mph. (less given drag and deceleration). This was a no brainier and I felt that there was more that could be explored given this scenario. We know that :

  1. The speed of the bullet relative to the car would be 60mph
  2. The speed of the bullet relative to the ground (or an observer standing on the ground) would be 120mph
  3. The speed of the car relative to the ground observer car would be 60mph

If they wanted to see the bullet 'hanging in the air next to them', (which is what they were trying to do) then they would need to fire the bullet from the ground and the exact moment the car passed the gun with the car going at the same speed as the bullet. They unfortunately did not try this as I would like to have seen it.

So we know that:

  1. The bullet, relative to the ground observer would be traveling at 60mph
  2. The car, relative to to the ground observer would be traveling at 60mph
  3. The bullet, relative to the car would be traveling at 0mph, as are both the same speed.
  4. The ground, relative to the car and the bullet would be traveling at -60mph. 

so this is case (excusing the drag, deceleration etc that would make this a lot more complicated) the passenger in the car would see a bullet 'floating' next to him just outside the car, while the ground observer would see the car and the bullet 'shoot' past at 60mph.

 An interesting question comes in when the passenger reaches out and grabs the bullet. Although the bullet is traveling, relative to him, at 0mph, the bullet still has momentum. What would happen to that momentum when the passenger grabs the bullet?  I assume that the momentum would either be passed to the passenger.. or not..

 If you know the answer to this please reply..

 The irony of this blog is that right now I'm a passenger in a taxi traveling at rather more than 60mph...... where's the bullet?


Posted in: Musings  Tags: , , ,

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
graemegets posted on April 5, 2008 15:48

Next time you are in daylight, step outside and realise this :- the light you are seeing is made up of photons. These photons originated on the sun and have traveled for 8 min over a distance of 93 million miles of space at the speed of... well light, and entered your eye, hitting your retina causing you to see!! Just think about that, photos from the sun, traveling 93 million miles and ending their journey at the back of your eye?

 Now step out during into the night and realise that photons from those stars, that are millions of lights years away, are also ending their journey in your eye! Think about it. Every single moment you have particles (or waves) from the stars hitting you, photos that are millions and millions of years old.

We truly are star people!! 


Posted in: Thats Amazing!  Tags:

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
graemegets posted on April 5, 2008 15:17

I was interested when watching Dragons Den about a common reaction to some of the ideas proposed. (Dragons Den is a TV program in the UK where people pitch their business ideas to a group of millionaires for investment).
 
The dragons often comment and reject an idea saying '...you are trying to find a solution to a problem that does not exist...'. What struck me is that this is a large part of capitalism. ie Think of a product no one actually needs, pump out masses of marketing to convince the public that without this product they are less than .. whatever... and then sell it by the ton. Have a look around you or when you are out xmas shopping. How much rubbish in the shops can you see that we don't actually need and is essentially worthless?
 
To me, what the dragons are saying is that the idea has no merit either because they don't want to be involved in that type of product OR they know that the amount of marketing that would need to be done for that one product will not bring a return.
 
This is a symptom of a capitalistic society where so much value is placed on wealth and business that in order for so many millions of people to make money and be successful, so many people end up selling products that we don't need and worse than that, damaging society by essentially degrading people to push them into buying products so that they can seem important or accepted in society...
 
This is big business!

 


Posted in: Musings  Tags:

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
graemegets posted on April 5, 2008 15:15

Blue RosesI was asked, during  an AB process on  course recently :- ‘If you cou ld ask God for one thing, what would you ask for?’.  We all sat in our groups and discussed the thing we would ask for and then we shared our thoughts. As I would have expected, almost everyone asked for ‘World peace’, ‘An end to Hunger’, ‘Freedom’ etc etc etc. In other words, the usual answers you would expect from a group of people trying to better themselves and the world around them. The sentiment of these responses is commendable and as I know most of the people in the group I know that they truly mean it. I could also understand that having these desires was a good place to start.  But I struggled with this one. It just seemed too easy. The answer that we were supposed to give was what our passion needed to be – ie where should we focus our energy. This was all very well, but still this did not work for me. The world seems to be in so much trouble (and indeed seems to have been in so much trouble since man learned to bang two rocks together). Asking God for one thing seemed to miss the mark somehow. It occurred to me that if we simply asked God to wave a Magic Wand and, ‘Puff’, world peace exists, that this would not really solve the issues of the world. Who’s world peace? Everyone’s?  Is everybody’s ‘World Peace’ the same as everyone else’s? I think not. If we all had the same idea of world peace then surly we would have no war. Would ‘World peace’ then also mean changing everyone’s perception of what world peace is?

The other problem is the ‘World Peace’ does not cover thinks like poverty, pollution depression etc . We can be in peace but still suffer. It does not cover the continued rape of our planet. It does not cover health, (mental or Physical). Has anyone ever really sat down and tried to work out what ‘World Peace’ actually is. Again, I think not. The point of all this is that the answers given are the simple answers, the easy answers, the ‘hand the responsibility on to someone else’ (in this case God) answer.

What if God did wave his (or Her) wand? Would we know how to deal with it – would it last? Would God keep check on us and enforce peace? And would the enforcement be a type of oppression. Or would we all be changed into something so completely different that we would not be human any more. I find it really hard to look at the population of today (or the past 100,000 years or so, for that matter) and see a society that is really capable of true peace. I am not convinced that we even really know and understand what true peace really is. 

Of cause, if we were to ‘get God to do this’ why has it not happened when millions of people pray for world peace, end of poverty etc each and every day? It would appear that millions of mass prayer goes unheard all the time. If God was ‘all powerful’ and a God that loves his children, then surely he would have waved his wand a long time ago – or perhaps it would never have needed waving in the first place. This, apparently, was the case until Eve ate the apple (original sin), but still, even then, wouldn’t an all powerful God be able to fix that? It seems to me that there must be a reason why God does not wave his wand. Either he is not as powerful as we would like to think he is or there is another plan in progress or we simply have the wrong idea about God. Im not sure that I can just keep blind faith that all is going as God intends.

So, when asked what I would ask of God, I replied ‘Blue Roses’,  with the hope that this might cause a shift in thinking. Actually, I’m not that fussy if it’s Blue Roses or Green skies or whatever. The point is that it needs to be something that makes the world as a whole stop and take a step back. Something to break our current thinking pattern. We need to be pushed into the thought process of ‘Perhaps there is something about the universe we don’t understand!’. It would also be of upmost importance that this ‘Miracle’ could not be attributed to one religion or group of people, in case they use it as ‘proof’ that their god/religion is the correct and powerful one. The last thing we need is a ‘See – we are right and you are wrong’ situation. No, we need some peaceful (ironic?) way to stop the world and make us think differently or at least to stop assuming that we know anything. My hope would be that this would get people  to think that the world as they see it is not actually the world that is. That what they thought they knew is not even close to what really is. Hopefully this would lead to more soul searching, less arrogance, more understanding, patience and the will to truly change ......

I think that, only in admitting that we have no clue what so ever, can we begin to design a new world where peace can truly exist – and I don’t think we would recognise it if we did.

 


Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
graemegets posted on April 5, 2008 14:26

I was on my way home the other day, crammed into the Northern underground in London. Those of you who know the London tube, know that rush hour involves millions of tired people, struggling to get into over packed tubes day in day out. People either listen to their iPods, stare trance-like into space or read the free newspapers that are shoved at you when entering tube stations.

I usually don't read the newspapers, preferring to either listen to music or listen to e-books. But its always tempting to peer over at the paper my co-traveler is reading or to see the odd headline. As you can imagine, the free newspaper is much like any other news paper, full of bad news with the odd bit of interesting news scattered around the morbid pages. Well, I was struck by one heading 'Psycho Dad Microwaves His Baby', in big bold letters, with a picture of the 'dad'  being lead off by some people. My very fist reaction, like everyone else I imagine, was one of shock, but only for about a millisecond. Not having the paper right in front of me, gave me the opportunity to ponder over news heading in general. So my second reaction was , Why the hell would anyone actually WANT to read that story?

What exactly is the benefit of having stories about such terrible things? How does knowing that information change the world for a better place. When a newspaper editor chooses what article to print, what exactly goes though their mind? I'm sure it not a case of thinking that people need to know it. Its is, as is obvious, just sensationalism, and the editor knows that that kind of story is what people want.... or is it?

 I wonder, if you ran a poll, if more people would prefer more factual, interesting information in a newspaper? I know that i would prefer articles about science, biology, progress, life skills, philosophy and just plain interesting stories. Now, not everyone would enjoy my selection, but is that not why we have so many different newspapers and magazines - yet they all have the same stories, albeit from a slightly different angle (sometimes).

 I just feel that the trip home on an over packed London tube would be just a bit better if people were not making themselves more miserable by reading the tripe. I do think that the media industry has a huge responsibility and effect on the general public - and so I ask the question  - do we actually need to know that some person microwaved his baby? Surly just the police need to know?


Posted in: Life, the universe and all  Tags:

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
graemegets posted on February 23, 2008 15:12

The question of what happens to us when we die is an age old question that will probably never be solved while alive. We might get to know when we have died, but we have no way of bringing that information back to the living. At least, not that we know of. For all the ghost stories, none seem to involved any spirit/ghost telling us what to expect after death. People through the ages have debated, argued and even fought over this and many theories exists for many different possibilities.

How do you envisage your after life’? Sitting on a cloud, living in some paradise or perhaps in hell and damnation. The imagination can go wild with 100 different ideas, but one thing these ideas have in common is that each one still requires the 5 senses we have in human (physical) form. How else can we perceive the bliss of heaven, paradise or the torment of hell in the way that most of us imagine it without our bodies. Of cause, when we die, we leave our bodies behind. That means our ears, eyes, skin(touch), nose and tongue. We also leave our brains which process our emotions (good and bad), which processes our senses, interprets what we think and makes our choices and defines how we perceive the world around us. We are always told that we can’t take it with us, but how many of us thought this might include our senses, our pleasure and our pain?

We are made up of these senses, thoughts and perceptions. We are the result of our collective thoughts and feelings as we travel through this life. Everything we are, we became through our senses and our brain. This is not to say that our spirit and or soul is not involved, but these, I believe, are still processed via our physical body. At least while we are alive.
Think also, about how we refer to ‘life after death’ or the ‘after life’. Both use the word ‘after’ and ‘life’. ‘After’ would indicates that there is ‘something’ after death.  That there is an ‘end’  to life and therefore a beginning to something else.  More importantly, we use the word ‘life’.  Yet we define life as being organic, physical, grown and reproduced. Something that is alive – not dead. Yet we use this word to describe what happens after death. In short, we use the word ‘life’ to describe death.

So what are we left with when we die? How will we experience our imagined heaven or hell without these senses and body parts? What we tend to do is envisage a spirit, that sees, hears, feels and thinks just like our physical bodies do. Buy why should they? Why have a physical body if our spirit can do all these things? Why become physical? Surly, when we die, we become something completely different. Perhaps, even as some people believe, it’s just pure oblivion after death. Perhaps we become part of the collective and loose our sense of individuality. The point is that when we die, the likelihood of any of these senses is minimal as our senses use physical chemistry to operate. As a spirit, we will not have a retina for photons to strike and cause nerve reactions that are interpreted by the brain as sight. You have to remember that what we see is merely an interpretation of nerve impulses that have been activated by photos, fed down the optical nerve to the image centres of the brain and processed. No one knows what the world or universe actually looks like. If fact, it does not look like anything. Or, for that matter, feel, taste or sound like anything. We only experience our world around us by processing information in a common way which is a function of our brains. Think how differently a bat ‘sees’ the world. A bat has no concept of how we see things and therefore, how the bat perceives the world is completely different to how we do. The same goes for many other animals that see, smell, hear differently to how we do.

There are different reasons why we do imagine our ‘after life’ in a similar way to how we experience life in a physical body. Our ideas of what happens after death might be defined by religions or philosophies that depend on fear of what happens in the afterlife to control people in the current life. How can you project an idea of punishment or reward without using sensations we already know?  And if not by religion, then by the mere fact that it’s almost impossible to imagine what happens after death any other way other than, say, oblivion. Much in the same way that we cannot handle the idea of the edge or end of the universe. Our minds cannot conceive of the end of the universe – there must be something on the other side of the universe. So is it the same for the afterlife, How can we perceive anything other than what we already know.

One of the points of this ramble, is that the likelihood of any similar sensations or method of environment perception after we die is very unlikely unless we acquire another body of sorts after death (such as re-incarnation?). In all likelihood, we will have none of our current senses. Perhaps we will have a different set of senses or a different way to process our afterlife environment.

One of the things that have become clear to me is that we have limited time to enjoy our physical senses and while we are alive, we should take full advantage of these sensations. Spend time to enjoy the taste of our food, the colour in the sunsets , the touch of your partners skin, the beautiful sounds around us. Even the unpleasant sensations we experience from time to time are only possible through our physical body and they can remind us just as well that we are physical, real and here right now. Enjoy being alive now because when you are dead, well, who knows.
If nothing else, ponder on what else could be waiting for us in the afterlife. How different could it be or how similar could it be. I guess that the answer to this would be tightly wrapped up in the meaning of existence – but that’s another discussion.

 


Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
graemegets posted on February 19, 2008 03:42
In Roman times the circus existed to bring entrainment to the people. Thousands of people would attend the circus to shout with bloodthirsty vigour as they watched people killing each other, being ripped apart and eaten alive by lions. To be a gladiator was to know certain death, to be a criminal was to know certain death. The public loved the kill and the circus was the only place to get that thrill without killing people yourself. (and ending up in the circus yourself for the crime).
 
Society today looks back on the olden day circus as barbaric, violent, disgusting and unbelievable. Certainly, their were people against the circus in those times and some even lead armies against Rome. In AD 325, Constantine put a brief stop to the circus, though it was overruled three years later. With Christianity becoming an official religion in AD 393, a ban was placed on putting Christians in the arena, but non-Christians still suffered and died in large numbers. It was only the lack of funding that eventually started to put an end to the circus.
 
In today's modern and supposedly 'civilised' world, the idea is shocking, and yet I don't think we have really changed one bit. The only difference between then and now is the circus is a place of family fun entertainment. But people still relish the the suffering of others. Both consciously and unconsciously. These days it generally does not involve blood, but I think its just as bad.
 
The most obvious way to see this is of cause from films and TV. We all know that violent films with lots of action sell better than one the promotes love and understanding. We also know that newspapers sell better when they are jam packed with bad news rather than good news. We as humans love disaster. There are still people who run dog fights, we see in Iraq how western forces degraded and tortured captured people.
 
A look at TV also shows us that people love programs where other people get hurt. Just take a look those programs that so called 'funny' clips from people. How many of those clips are about someone hurting them selves with canned laughter just to make sure you know when to laugh. We love reality shows that involve people getting into fights and arguments and if a fist fight happens then all the better - ratings up. We even love watching people being told to eat disgusting things and to terrible things in reality shows.
 
Then there are the hundreds of games that promote the idea of killing. I going into a computer game shop and being stunned at the number of games that involved killing and then seeing the small shelf that have non-violent games.
 
Are we really any different to the public that loved the games in Rome?
 
I think a classic example of going for the kill was the whole Jade Goodie, Shilpa Shetty debacle. I think we can all agree that her behaviour was not the best and that the really should not have said (in anger) what she did. But what is amazing is that the public and the media went in for the kill in a far more vicious and longer attack than Jade was ever guilty of. It struck me that the photos that where splashed all over the papers of Jade with some terrible expression on her face would have taken the media people very conscious and specific effort to go through the footage frame by frame to find the picture that made Jade look the worst. The public bought newspapers ten to the dozen, people wrote hate letters and death threats. All in all, I think that what the public and the newspapers did to Jade Goody was tantamount to throwing her in arena with the lions. In fact that might have been kinder than the pain that she suffered and is still suffering.
 
So no, I don't think that we are any different or more civilised than the Romans who relished in the games.
 
I think that when we start to take a step back and have a really honest, good look at ourselves and our actions, we might begin to see that actually we have a long way to go before we can call ourselves civilised. Only when we start to really act with compassion and understanding can be begin to put out our love for the kill.
 
But until then, we are nothing but the crowd loving the blood at the circus.

Posted in: Life, the universe and all  Tags:

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
graemegets posted on January 15, 2008 15:05

Stop Smoking! Now!I struggled for years and years to give up smoking and while I think I've cracked it this time, it still takes some work. I started smoking (as you do) when I was 16 years old, but not quite for the usual reason. True, my friends smoked and there certainly was an aspect of wanting to join them, but they were very against me starting , which I was quite surprised at. My typical Aries obstinance kicked in and I went ahead anyway. The biggest reason why i started the process of was the curiosity as to what people saw in smoking. I figured that there must be something in it and that's why so many people smoked – otherwise, why on earth suck smoke into your lungs and pollute your body. I can remember being very nervous when going out to buy a packet of cigarettes. I had never so much as even tried to puff one before and knew I was definitely breaking the rules. I bought a packet of Winston (as that's what my friends at the time were smoking) , took one out and gave a sniff. Smelled ok. So I put it in my mouth, lit it and immediately coughed my lungs out, went green and felt sick.

Now any normal person might have decided that after feeling that bad after one cigarette that actually it was not nice and the fact that other people seems to enjoy it could safely be filed away in the ‘Unexplained Mysteries' folder. But, for me that was not enough. ‘I wonder' I though...' There must be something in it after a while, you know, once you get used to it'. So I persevered and very soon (very very soon) found that I really enjoyed lighting up. The experiment was successful. I understood why people smoked. Of cause the fact that I was being rebellious, and ‘with the in crowd' added to my motivation.

For some season, while I was pondering all this, it did not really occur to me exactly how addictive nicotine actually is and that's why people continue to so it. But at the time, I was young, body was strong and hell, I was a teenager, I could do anything.

When I was about 22 or so, I decided that I really should give up. Going out at night, drinking a lot and smoking heavily did not feel so good anymore. It was costing a lot of money and it really stank. So my long long journey started in trying to give up and like so many managed to give up numerous times, only to start again. Stress and booze and coffee were the worst triggers to start smoking again. My (now Ex) wife and both smoked and we both wanted to give up. But when we tried (we always tried together) we would become extremely irritable and start fighting like mad, which would lead to stress. Of cause the only thing that would stop the fighting and the stress was another cigarette.

Time after time I would fail, each time proving to myself that, actually, it's not worth trying to give up and anyway, I enjoyed it.... but then again, I hated it, hated myself for being such a slave to it. I began to realise that my life revolved around smoking. I would not go to places where I could not smoke. Clock watching for the moment I could escape and relieve the demon inside that demanded to be fed. Living in hell if I would not get out for the smoke or had run out and was unable to get more.

I was a slave, and the craving was a brutal. When I tried to escape, the punishment was dealt out with no mercy what so ever. The pain, both physical and mental was too terrible to bare. The sense of failure, of being controlled by something much stronger than myself. I truly thought I would never be free of this trap I had put myself in.

But each time I tried, I also began to learn how this master worked. What it did to beat me and I found it both fascinating and scary. I started to learn its tricks and then to formulate a rebellion.

The first step, I realised is that I needed to be ready. Even though I know I wanted to stop, there was a switch in my head that I had to wait for before I could even start giving up. I knew that if I did not wait for this switch, I would only lat a few days at the most. I never did find out what make the switch happen, but knew the feeling it had in me. I had learned from so many failed attempts what this switch felt like and I had learned not to ignore it. But it was only the first step in the battle of understanding the process. I knew that when that switch switched, I was far more successful. In other words, instead of failing after 1 or two days and being in agony I would be able to last weeks, even months before I failed and it was not as painful.

I knew that for me Nicotine patched worked quite well because they took the edge off the craving and also help to get me out of the habit having something in my hands. I found that using the nicotine gum or inhaler would just re-enforce the smoking craving because every time I had a craving (which was very often) I would need to physically put something in my mouth which would then stop the craving. The patches on the other hand worked silently without having to put an action to the craving. This is such a strong habit of smoking. Every time you have a craving you appease the craving by putting something with nicotine in your mouth – this can only remind you that actually you would rather have a cigarette. If cause, the patches on their own won't work. It's not that easy – it never is. But it does go a long way to taking off the edge which is an incredible help.

Now, people will tell you that you need will power to give up smoking and yes, that is very true, but in experience, you need to understand what is happening to your will power when you give up. After all, its will power that gets you through the first day or so. Its will power that will push through the pain, the irritation and desperation. But, and this is a big but, your will power is subject to your though processes and this is where I found the real trick came into play.

What I could not understand was why it was so easy to fail. Why it was easier to carry on smoking than give up. I had read that Nicotine leave your body after 3 or so days and yet the cravings go on for so much longer than that. Why, when I had adamantly decide to give my would I have a change of mind. Why did I change my mind, loose my will power. It was almost like I became a different person. My reasons would disappear, I would start believing that it was ok to smoke, that I would never die from it, after all, not everyone died of smoking. The more this tug of war happened in my mind the more I began to realise that my brain is playing games with me.

My brain has built up nicotine receptors that need to be fed and is now running a program (like a virus) that will do anything to ensure that I keep feeding nicotine into my body. I realised that my though patterns would change, my reasoning would change. Its was like I was being brainwashed. So I developed a way of dealing with self, my though patterns. I knew that when I would start craving, my brain would start telling me why I should smoke. So when this happened, I moved into a third person position and watched my thoughts change. I began to learn exactly what my brain would say to me, which bits of reasoning it would block off and replace with a pro smoking reason. While in this third person position, I realised that I could start counteracting and play my brain at its own game.

Now, this might all sound really bazaar and perhaps the men in the white coats should just come and take me away, but i think that this is what really happens to people who try to give up. The brain will change your thinking to ensure that you keep smoking. It's a survival tactic gone wrong and if you want to succeed in giving up smoking without the pain then you need to learn exactly what your brain is telling you and exactly how to counteract it. Putting yourself in a third person position enables you to watch yourself and more importantly study yourself. When your brain starts to tell you why you should smoke, why it's alright to smoke and why you won't die if you continue to smoke, you are then able to ‘talk back to your brain' because the third person part of you is not being affected. I literally found that when I would crave, my thoughts would go something like this:

Me : I feel like a smoke

Me : But I really don't want to smoke

Brain : Of cause you do, you love smoking

Me : but I don't really good

Brain : Yes you do, and you'll be just fine, trust me. Go on, just have one, you can give up after that.

... and so on...

I found that being in third person and observing this interaction gave me the strength to stop being such a victim. My third person would interject with ‘Nice try brain, but I see what you're doing to me and I know your tricks....'. This process really helped to stop the change in my thoughts and continue with the process.

Part of playing the game is to be conscious about your body and your thoughts. When I had a strong craving, I would (after my third person had stopped the thought process) use the pain or desperation of the craving to enforce the fact that I was a slave and wanted to break free. At the same time, I would force myself to think how wonderful it was to be free and I would imagine myself breaking free of chains and running, free and healthy. After a few days when my lungs began to feel better I would take a deep breath and think about how wonderful it is to breathe deeply. I began to imagine my lungs as a car piston. I visualised, with each beep breath, the piston beginning to move more freely and smoothly. I visualised clean, shiny metal. Pumping air in and out of my body. I visualised all the dirty carbon falling away and then made myself feel happy about how great it was..

To me the most powerful part of giving up smoking is to work with yourself and play the mind game back. Your body or brain is going to do everything it can to try keep smoking – that's what being addicted is all about. You need to constantly play the game. See the process as fascinating. That's the beauty of being in third person, you can watch yourself and be amused at how you think and what you do. Like a parent watching their child and being amused at how its struggling with some concept. Watching how it things and more importantly (ion terms of the addiction) catching it thought process out – ‘Ha – heard that... did you really think could convince me to have that smoke' . You will be amazed how well that works.

The 10 basic steps to giving up.

Be ok with the fact that it's a hard thing to do
Know , really know, that you want to give up
Wait for that switch if you can. This is a little like ‘waiting for the right time'. Something it works well if you stop at the same time you have a pleasant change in your life. Don't choose a stress full time. I have found that a trip overseas, or some big event can help. You can link the excitement of that event into the excitement of giving up.
Start to visualise yourself smoke free. Play this game : Visualise yourself smoking and see yourself as sad, make the picture dark and smoggy. Add bad smell, anything to make the picture bleak. Then visualise yourself not smoking, and make the picture bright, clear, happy and colourful. Do this every time you feel you want to smoke. Even before you have stopped. If fact, its best to start this before you have stopped. I used to light up and then while smoking, think about how bad it smelled, what my lungs felt like, the expense etc etc and then I would start thinking about what it would be like to be free.
Take note of the trigger points. In other words, what triggers the craving. I'm not talking so much about stress or when your boss shouts at you etc. Neither am I talking about the ‘after dinner' smoke, or the ‘ when I drink' smoke. While they are important to note, they are the obvious ones. I noticed, for example, that when I was driving to work I would smoke two cigarettes. One when I passed the petrol Station and one as I entered the town where I worked. I realised that the petrol station was a ‘half way mark' and the beginning of the town was the ‘I'm almost at work I better have another one' smoke. Track these triggers and you come up against them, realise the trigger, smile at yourself knowingly and choose not to have a smoke.
Stop drinking and going to bars for a while. While you might miss your friends, just stay away from the drink. You know how your will power goes down the toilet after a pint or two.
Start eating better food. You body will go through a lot of stress. Give it all the help you can. Eat lots of vegetables and lots of fruit and lots of water. Give your body the raw materials its needs rather than bogging it down with other poisons. Basically, give your body a chance.
Start to watch your thoughts and play the game back. Your brain WILL do everything it can to keep you smoking and the game is to outsmart it.
Every time you get a craving, and you don't smoke, be happy and proud of yourself.
If you fail, don't beat yourself up – it only hurts. Rather look at what it was that got you started, analyse your thought process and add that as ammunition for the next time you try. When you fight someone, every time you loose, you have learned something new about that person which gives you advantage over them. And when you now more about them than they do about you then you WIN!


Posted in: Health  Tags:

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Page List

Calendar

«  July 2008  »
MoTuWeThFrSaSu
30123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031123
45678910
View posts in large calendar

Authors

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Banners

Theme Grabber
Disclaimer
The opinions expressed herein are my own personal opinions and do not represent my employer's view in anyway.

© Copyright 2008 Ponderings of a Fool