graemegets posted on April 5, 2008 15:15

Blue RosesI was asked, during  an AB process on  course recently :- ‘If you cou ld ask God for one thing, what would you ask for?’.  We all sat in our groups and discussed the thing we would ask for and then we shared our thoughts. As I would have expected, almost everyone asked for ‘World peace’, ‘An end to Hunger’, ‘Freedom’ etc etc etc. In other words, the usual answers you would expect from a group of people trying to better themselves and the world around them. The sentiment of these responses is commendable and as I know most of the people in the group I know that they truly mean it. I could also understand that having these desires was a good place to start.  But I struggled with this one. It just seemed too easy. The answer that we were supposed to give was what our passion needed to be – ie where should we focus our energy. This was all very well, but still this did not work for me. The world seems to be in so much trouble (and indeed seems to have been in so much trouble since man learned to bang two rocks together). Asking God for one thing seemed to miss the mark somehow. It occurred to me that if we simply asked God to wave a Magic Wand and, ‘Puff’, world peace exists, that this would not really solve the issues of the world. Who’s world peace? Everyone’s?  Is everybody’s ‘World Peace’ the same as everyone else’s? I think not. If we all had the same idea of world peace then surly we would have no war. Would ‘World peace’ then also mean changing everyone’s perception of what world peace is?

The other problem is the ‘World Peace’ does not cover thinks like poverty, pollution depression etc . We can be in peace but still suffer. It does not cover the continued rape of our planet. It does not cover health, (mental or Physical). Has anyone ever really sat down and tried to work out what ‘World Peace’ actually is. Again, I think not. The point of all this is that the answers given are the simple answers, the easy answers, the ‘hand the responsibility on to someone else’ (in this case God) answer.

What if God did wave his (or Her) wand? Would we know how to deal with it – would it last? Would God keep check on us and enforce peace? And would the enforcement be a type of oppression. Or would we all be changed into something so completely different that we would not be human any more. I find it really hard to look at the population of today (or the past 100,000 years or so, for that matter) and see a society that is really capable of true peace. I am not convinced that we even really know and understand what true peace really is. 

Of cause, if we were to ‘get God to do this’ why has it not happened when millions of people pray for world peace, end of poverty etc each and every day? It would appear that millions of mass prayer goes unheard all the time. If God was ‘all powerful’ and a God that loves his children, then surely he would have waved his wand a long time ago – or perhaps it would never have needed waving in the first place. This, apparently, was the case until Eve ate the apple (original sin), but still, even then, wouldn’t an all powerful God be able to fix that? It seems to me that there must be a reason why God does not wave his wand. Either he is not as powerful as we would like to think he is or there is another plan in progress or we simply have the wrong idea about God. Im not sure that I can just keep blind faith that all is going as God intends.

So, when asked what I would ask of God, I replied ‘Blue Roses’,  with the hope that this might cause a shift in thinking. Actually, I’m not that fussy if it’s Blue Roses or Green skies or whatever. The point is that it needs to be something that makes the world as a whole stop and take a step back. Something to break our current thinking pattern. We need to be pushed into the thought process of ‘Perhaps there is something about the universe we don’t understand!’. It would also be of upmost importance that this ‘Miracle’ could not be attributed to one religion or group of people, in case they use it as ‘proof’ that their god/religion is the correct and powerful one. The last thing we need is a ‘See – we are right and you are wrong’ situation. No, we need some peaceful (ironic?) way to stop the world and make us think differently or at least to stop assuming that we know anything. My hope would be that this would get people  to think that the world as they see it is not actually the world that is. That what they thought they knew is not even close to what really is. Hopefully this would lead to more soul searching, less arrogance, more understanding, patience and the will to truly change ......

I think that, only in admitting that we have no clue what so ever, can we begin to design a new world where peace can truly exist – and I don’t think we would recognise it if we did.

 


Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
graemegets posted on April 5, 2008 14:26

I was on my way home the other day, crammed into the Northern underground in London. Those of you who know the London tube, know that rush hour involves millions of tired people, struggling to get into over packed tubes day in day out. People either listen to their iPods, stare trance-like into space or read the free newspapers that are shoved at you when entering tube stations.

I usually don't read the newspapers, preferring to either listen to music or listen to e-books. But its always tempting to peer over at the paper my co-traveler is reading or to see the odd headline. As you can imagine, the free newspaper is much like any other news paper, full of bad news with the odd bit of interesting news scattered around the morbid pages. Well, I was struck by one heading 'Psycho Dad Microwaves His Baby', in big bold letters, with a picture of the 'dad'  being lead off by some people. My very fist reaction, like everyone else I imagine, was one of shock, but only for about a millisecond. Not having the paper right in front of me, gave me the opportunity to ponder over news heading in general. So my second reaction was , Why the hell would anyone actually WANT to read that story?

What exactly is the benefit of having stories about such terrible things? How does knowing that information change the world for a better place. When a newspaper editor chooses what article to print, what exactly goes though their mind? I'm sure it not a case of thinking that people need to know it. Its is, as is obvious, just sensationalism, and the editor knows that that kind of story is what people want.... or is it?

 I wonder, if you ran a poll, if more people would prefer more factual, interesting information in a newspaper? I know that i would prefer articles about science, biology, progress, life skills, philosophy and just plain interesting stories. Now, not everyone would enjoy my selection, but is that not why we have so many different newspapers and magazines - yet they all have the same stories, albeit from a slightly different angle (sometimes).

 I just feel that the trip home on an over packed London tube would be just a bit better if people were not making themselves more miserable by reading the tripe. I do think that the media industry has a huge responsibility and effect on the general public - and so I ask the question  - do we actually need to know that some person microwaved his baby? Surly just the police need to know?


Posted in: Life, the universe and all  Tags:

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
graemegets posted on February 23, 2008 15:12

The question of what happens to us when we die is an age old question that will probably never be solved while alive. We might get to know when we have died, but we have no way of bringing that information back to the living. At least, not that we know of. For all the ghost stories, none seem to involved any spirit/ghost telling us what to expect after death. People through the ages have debated, argued and even fought over this and many theories exists for many different possibilities.

How do you envisage your after life’? Sitting on a cloud, living in some paradise or perhaps in hell and damnation. The imagination can go wild with 100 different ideas, but one thing these ideas have in common is that each one still requires the 5 senses we have in human (physical) form. How else can we perceive the bliss of heaven, paradise or the torment of hell in the way that most of us imagine it without our bodies. Of cause, when we die, we leave our bodies behind. That means our ears, eyes, skin(touch), nose and tongue. We also leave our brains which process our emotions (good and bad), which processes our senses, interprets what we think and makes our choices and defines how we perceive the world around us. We are always told that we can’t take it with us, but how many of us thought this might include our senses, our pleasure and our pain?

We are made up of these senses, thoughts and perceptions. We are the result of our collective thoughts and feelings as we travel through this life. Everything we are, we became through our senses and our brain. This is not to say that our spirit and or soul is not involved, but these, I believe, are still processed via our physical body. At least while we are alive.
Think also, about how we refer to ‘life after death’ or the ‘after life’. Both use the word ‘after’ and ‘life’. ‘After’ would indicates that there is ‘something’ after death.  That there is an ‘end’  to life and therefore a beginning to something else.  More importantly, we use the word ‘life’.  Yet we define life as being organic, physical, grown and reproduced. Something that is alive – not dead. Yet we use this word to describe what happens after death. In short, we use the word ‘life’ to describe death.

So what are we left with when we die? How will we experience our imagined heaven or hell without these senses and body parts? What we tend to do is envisage a spirit, that sees, hears, feels and thinks just like our physical bodies do. Buy why should they? Why have a physical body if our spirit can do all these things? Why become physical? Surly, when we die, we become something completely different. Perhaps, even as some people believe, it’s just pure oblivion after death. Perhaps we become part of the collective and loose our sense of individuality. The point is that when we die, the likelihood of any of these senses is minimal as our senses use physical chemistry to operate. As a spirit, we will not have a retina for photons to strike and cause nerve reactions that are interpreted by the brain as sight. You have to remember that what we see is merely an interpretation of nerve impulses that have been activated by photos, fed down the optical nerve to the image centres of the brain and processed. No one knows what the world or universe actually looks like. If fact, it does not look like anything. Or, for that matter, feel, taste or sound like anything. We only experience our world around us by processing information in a common way which is a function of our brains. Think how differently a bat ‘sees’ the world. A bat has no concept of how we see things and therefore, how the bat perceives the world is completely different to how we do. The same goes for many other animals that see, smell, hear differently to how we do.

There are different reasons why we do imagine our ‘after life’ in a similar way to how we experience life in a physical body. Our ideas of what happens after death might be defined by religions or philosophies that depend on fear of what happens in the afterlife to control people in the current life. How can you project an idea of punishment or reward without using sensations we already know?  And if not by religion, then by the mere fact that it’s almost impossible to imagine what happens after death any other way other than, say, oblivion. Much in the same way that we cannot handle the idea of the edge or end of the universe. Our minds cannot conceive of the end of the universe – there must be something on the other side of the universe. So is it the same for the afterlife, How can we perceive anything other than what we already know.

One of the points of this ramble, is that the likelihood of any similar sensations or method of environment perception after we die is very unlikely unless we acquire another body of sorts after death (such as re-incarnation?). In all likelihood, we will have none of our current senses. Perhaps we will have a different set of senses or a different way to process our afterlife environment.

One of the things that have become clear to me is that we have limited time to enjoy our physical senses and while we are alive, we should take full advantage of these sensations. Spend time to enjoy the taste of our food, the colour in the sunsets , the touch of your partners skin, the beautiful sounds around us. Even the unpleasant sensations we experience from time to time are only possible through our physical body and they can remind us just as well that we are physical, real and here right now. Enjoy being alive now because when you are dead, well, who knows.
If nothing else, ponder on what else could be waiting for us in the afterlife. How different could it be or how similar could it be. I guess that the answer to this would be tightly wrapped up in the meaning of existence – but that’s another discussion.

 


Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
graemegets posted on February 19, 2008 03:42
In Roman times the circus existed to bring entrainment to the people. Thousands of people would attend the circus to shout with bloodthirsty vigour as they watched people killing each other, being ripped apart and eaten alive by lions. To be a gladiator was to know certain death, to be a criminal was to know certain death. The public loved the kill and the circus was the only place to get that thrill without killing people yourself. (and ending up in the circus yourself for the crime).
 
Society today looks back on the olden day circus as barbaric, violent, disgusting and unbelievable. Certainly, their were people against the circus in those times and some even lead armies against Rome. In AD 325, Constantine put a brief stop to the circus, though it was overruled three years later. With Christianity becoming an official religion in AD 393, a ban was placed on putting Christians in the arena, but non-Christians still suffered and died in large numbers. It was only the lack of funding that eventually started to put an end to the circus.
 
In today's modern and supposedly 'civilised' world, the idea is shocking, and yet I don't think we have really changed one bit. The only difference between then and now is the circus is a place of family fun entertainment. But people still relish the the suffering of others. Both consciously and unconsciously. These days it generally does not involve blood, but I think its just as bad.
 
The most obvious way to see this is of cause from films and TV. We all know that violent films with lots of action sell better than one the promotes love and understanding. We also know that newspapers sell better when they are jam packed with bad news rather than good news. We as humans love disaster. There are still people who run dog fights, we see in Iraq how western forces degraded and tortured captured people.
 
A look at TV also shows us that people love programs where other people get hurt. Just take a look those programs that so called 'funny' clips from people. How many of those clips are about someone hurting them selves with canned laughter just to make sure you know when to laugh. We love reality shows that involve people getting into fights and arguments and if a fist fight happens then all the better - ratings up. We even love watching people being told to eat disgusting things and to terrible things in reality shows.
 
Then there are the hundreds of games that promote the idea of killing. I going into a computer game shop and being stunned at the number of games that involved killing and then seeing the small shelf that have non-violent games.
 
Are we really any different to the public that loved the games in Rome?
 
I think a classic example of going for the kill was the whole Jade Goodie, Shilpa Shetty debacle. I think we can all agree that her behaviour was not the best and that the really should not have said (in anger) what she did. But what is amazing is that the public and the media went in for the kill in a far more vicious and longer attack than Jade was ever guilty of. It struck me that the photos that where splashed all over the papers of Jade with some terrible expression on her face would have taken the media people very conscious and specific effort to go through the footage frame by frame to find the picture that made Jade look the worst. The public bought newspapers ten to the dozen, people wrote hate letters and death threats. All in all, I think that what the public and the newspapers did to Jade Goody was tantamount to throwing her in arena with the lions. In fact that might have been kinder than the pain that she suffered and is still suffering.
 
So no, I don't think that we are any different or more civilised than the Romans who relished in the games.
 
I think that when we start to take a step back and have a really honest, good look at ourselves and our actions, we might begin to see that actually we have a long way to go before we can call ourselves civilised. Only when we start to really act with compassion and understanding can be begin to put out our love for the kill.
 
But until then, we are nothing but the crowd loving the blood at the circus.

Posted in: Life, the universe and all  Tags:

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
graemegets posted on January 5, 2008 15:19
What is consciousness for? We know what most of the body is for, we understand how most of it works. We understand survival instincts and procreation instincts, but why exactly do we have consciousness? What, at a basic survival level, does it do for us?
 
This is probably one of the biggest clues to 'there's something else out there' and not just a god that wants devotion. If that was the case then why free will?
 
Think about it - why have consciousness? Why have the ability to self-reflect?

Posted in: Life, the universe and all  Tags:

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
graemegets posted on September 7, 2007 15:03

Have you ever thought about how we project everything in our lives? Do you think that what you see, what you hear, what you feel is really happening in the places you think you see, hear for feel it?

We are so good at projecting a world around us that it really does seem to us that we live in a world that we experience as out side of us, that we experience in relation to us. But think about it. Take seeing for example; when we ‘look out of' our eyes, we see a so called 3D world around us. We see things in front of us, to the sides of us, above and below us. Then we assume that we are actually seeing those things at certain positions from us. When we hear a sound, we can detect the location of the sound, even the distance of the sound from us. Then we assume that we are hearing that sound at that place. How about feeling? We stub a toe and we feel the pain in the toe.

Actually, what is happening is that our brains are being fed information and then we project the result of that information in our minds so that we think we are seeing, hearing or feeling something external to us. When we see something, say a table in front of us, we are really experiencing a chemical reaction in our brains. Nothing else! The table we are seeing is actually in our brain as a mass of neural reactions. Part of that reaction is to project what we have come to understand as an image from the point of our eyes outwards. In the same way a projector does. The image in a projector is actually inside the projector and the image on the wall is a representation of the image, not the actual image. (well strictly speaking so is the slide in the projector). The image you are seeing now is not outside of you, its being processed and projected from the back of your brain, where the visual cortex is located. Unlike a film projector, the image is not being projected from your eyes. Your eyes do not see, your visual cortex does.

The same would go for sound and feeling. Your ears receive vibrations of air pressure and encode that as what we understand as sound. Our brains then use the information and time differences between the ears to project the sensation of sound at a specific location. What ever is the cause of the sound is not actually making any sound at all. Only differences in air pressure.

Think about that – the beautiful music we love is nothing other than differences in air pressure!!


We are the ones who make it into sound. With feeling/ touch, again our brains receive nerve impulses that encode those signals as touch or pain/sensation. In reality we are not feeling anything. The is no such thing as pain, or sensation.

We live in a world that is a 3D virtual representation of photons, air vibrations and electrical impulses. And we are so confidant that what we experience it as if it's actually out there. Nothing could be further from the truth. Even though we see a 3D world, we are only really getting a semi 3D representation. Our eyes are only about 4 or 5 cm apart. That only gives us a very narrow sense of depth. It's just enough for us to build a picture that has distance and depth. How different would the world look if we had eyes that were a meter apart, or if we had four eyes, two on the side and above and below the horizontal plain? What would the world look like if we could encode more of the light spectrum? What if we could see infra red, ultra green? How about x-rays or gamma rays? All these, like visible light, are part of the electromagnetic spectrum. Yet we don't see them.

We assume that what we perceive, is actually there, but we can never know the objects really look like, or what a trumpet actually sounds like (it doesn't), or what a tender touch really is. We live in a make believe world, something that we construct and project, but actually only exists in our heads. For all we know, we mat not even exist in physical form. Perhaps we project the sensation of being alive and living on a planet - how can we really know?

 


Posted in: Life, the universe and all  Tags:

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Page List

Calendar

«  January 2009  »
MoTuWeThFrSaSu
2930311234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930311
2345678
View posts in large calendar

Authors

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Banners

Theme Grabber
Disclaimer
The opinions expressed herein are my own personal opinions and do not represent my employer's view in anyway.

© Copyright 2009 Ponderings of a Fool